R v AL - 2025 ABKB

R v AL - 2025 ABKB

AL was convicted of inappropriately touching the child of a former romantic partner. We appealed the conviction on the basis that the Trial Judge had failed to consider serious contradictions in the child's testimony, while at the same time using very minor discrepancies in AL's evidence to discredit him. The appeal was granted from the bench (a rare result), and the Crown later withdrew the charges rather than proceed to a re-trial.

By
Jul 2025
Share this case study

AL was convicted of inappropriately touching the child of a former romantic partner. We appealed the conviction on the basis that the Trial Judge had failed to consider serious contradictions in the child's testimony, while at the same time using very minor discrepancies in AL's evidence to discredit him. The appeal was granted from the bench (a rare result), and the Crown later withdrew the charges rather than proceed to a re-trial.

Get Your Free Consultation Today

Are you facing a similar case? Schedule a free consultation today